Brexit chaos drags European Parliament polls into legal confusion

Britain’s departure from the European Union (EU) could paralyse law-making in Brussels for at least 5 years.

Brexit may now not happen before October 31st, after European leaders agreed last week to allow more time for Prime Minister Theresa May and the U.K.’s parliament to sort out the country’s exit from the EU.

But if current divergences in London over Brexit are not solved by May 22, then Britain will have to take part in European Parliamentary elections — opening unprecedented legal and political challenges to the EU.

Holding EU elections in the U.K. is set to fatally affect the good functioning of the next European Parliament (the EU’s legislative arm) – as well as the entire Union – for the five years to come, two European law experts told CNBC in emailed remarks.

Not only the British participation in the elections is set to distort the new political balance emerging within the new Parliament, but also to irremediably tarnish the validity of the Parliament’s future decisions, Alberto Alemanno, Professor of EU law at HEC Paris, and Benjamin Bodson, researcher in EU law at UCLouvain said.

European citizens elect new lawmakers to the European Parliament every five years. Following the U.K.’s request to exit the union in 2017, the European chamber has prepared for the fact that 73 British members of the European Parliament would not be taking their seats.

The EU decided to allocate further seats to certain countries and keep some of the other seats empty for when new countries join the Union. This decision stated that the upcoming parliament would be formed by 705 members, from the 751 today; and it would award 27 extra-seats to 14 member states.

However, with the possibility that the U.K. will remain a member until October 31st, the European Parliament is yet to agree what to do with the seat allocation.

If it follows the old rules and 751 members of the European Parliament (MEPs) are elected, it will break the principle of “degressive proportionally” – meaning that countries such as Sweden, Austria and Spain will be less represented than other countries with similar population sizes, Alemanno pointed out, saying this would breach European law.

But if the new rules remain and 14 European countries are allowed to get 27 out of the 73 U.K. seats, the question then becomes when these extra MEPs would be able to start their jobs.

“These soon-to-be MEPs could argue that the treaties ensure them a term of five years, not less, and require to start their position as soon as July 2, when the new European Parliament will be sitting for the first time (and not whenever the U.K. leaves),” Alemmano said.

“On the other hand, ‘temporarily’ elected British MEPs could invoke the same provision to stay after the UK’s withdrawal. This would lead the new European Parliament to have a record number of 778 MEPs,” the law professor also said, pointing to another breach of European rules.

Legal implications aside, there are also political consequences of delaying the U.K.’s departure beyond the month of May.

U.K. voters could have a strong say on who is the biggest political force at the European Parliament — ultimately influencing the direction of futures decisions.

“It’s not easy to explain to the French, to the Polish, to the Austrian citizens that again the country who is leaving the EU will have a major say in the future decision-making process of the EU. That is a political challenge ahead,” Manfred Weber, the head of the conservative party at the European Parliament, told CNBC last week in an exclusive interview.

A poll for the British think tank Open Europe showed last Wednesday that the Labour Party could get as much as 38 percent of U.K. votes – which could be a big support for the Socialist family at the European Parliament, potentially making it the biggest force in the chamber.

Christoph Schon, executive director of Axioma, an investment platform, told CNBC that the majority of moderate candidates will struggle to convince their constituents to vote for them or to even put a list of candidates together given that the elected lawmakers could be out of the job a few months later.

“Then you have the likes of Nigel Farage ( a pro-Brexit populist politician) who use this as an excuse to re-enter the political arena and to stir up discontent. This, in turn, will provide disgruntled voters with a way of venting their anger and frustration,” he also said.

“If, however, we somehow end up in a situation where Britain remains in the EU — still a distinct possibility in my view — then we will be stuck with a skewed sample of MEPs, who are in no way representative of the majority of British voters and who are bound to cause a lot of trouble alongside their populist allies from other member states,” Schon added.

Source: CNBC

Comments
Loading...