Isis Flees Brand Tainted By Terror

Isis, the electronic payment service founded by AT&T Mobility, T-Mobile USA, and Verizon Wireless, has decided to change its name to avoid being associated with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, the militant group also known as ISIS (the English translation of the group’s name as rendered as an acronym).

CEO Michael Abbott announced the company’s intention to rebrand itself in light of the militant group’s involvement in violence against civilians and government forces in Iraq and Syria.

“However coincidental, we have no interest in sharing a name with a group whose name has become synonymous with violence and our hearts go out to those who are suffering,” Abbott said in a statement. “As a company, we have made the decision to rebrand.”

Duplicate acronyms don’t always cause problems. One of Isis’s parent companies, AT&T, shares the letters of its name with ATT, the UK’s Association of Taxation Technicians and with the IATA code for the Atmautluak Airport in Alaska. If any confusion has arisen from the overlap, it hasn’t been sufficient to pique the interest of trademark lawyers.

Though it’s sometimes said — from behind the safety of a desk — that the pen is mightier than the sword, you won’t see anyone charging into Iraq brandishing a ballpoint pen in defense of the Isis name.

Given that the Isis payment service is barely established as a brand — launched last November, the company in May boasted an average of 20,000 Isis Wallet activations per day for the previous 30 days — a name change should not be all that painful.

Whatever the name the company takes for itself — a new moniker has yet to be decided — the firm formerly known as Isis has more pressing concerns. Last fall, Google introduced a technology called Host Card Emulation (HCE) in Android 4.4 (KitKat). HCE makes it possible to emulate smart cards in software and to store credit information in the cloud, bypassing carrier-controlled NFC hardware. Isis’s founders, which wanted to be transaction gatekeepers, may no longer be a necessary part of the mobile payment systems that eventually find favor in the market.

What’s more, by cutting and running, the entity once called Isis may be setting a bad precedent. If mayhem is all it takes to prompt trademark holders to abandon their name claims, it won’t be long before we see terror groups co-opting corporate names and acronyms like IBM (Incorrigible Buddhist Mercenaries), HP (Holy Partisans), and Dell (Devious Enemies of Laos and Latvia) to further their agendas with publicity that unbranded violence just can’t buy.

Still, it’s uncertain whether consumers really want an alternative to existing payment mechanisms. According to a Forrester report released in December, “Understanding Digital Wallet Options For Your Business,” only 11% of US consumers have a digital wallet. “Driving consumer interest and adoption is a steep, uphill climb in developed markets because the current payment systems work quite well,” the report says.

Maybe Isis would fare better in the market if it rode ISIS’s wave of infamy without blinking.

Source :Information Week